Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim was charged yesterday in a session court. Apparently as a replacement for the AG. The Solicitor General Datuk Idris Harun found enough evidence to charge Anwar.
Datuk Idris Harun is replacing his Boss, the Attorney General Datuk Gani Patail. Because Gani Patail himself is implicated with another case involving Anwar. Which is the fabrication of evidence in the 1998 sodomy trial. Anwar filed the charge against him and the IGP Musa Hassan. Do you think the Solicitor General truly act on his own Accord while his boss, the AG is around?
"Anwar was charged under Section 377B of the Penal Code, which his lawyers said referred to consensual sodomy". Now if it is true that Anwar is brought to court for having anal sex consensually with Saiful, then why Saiful is not similarly charge by committing the same crime?
It's common sense, Saiful is evidently an accomplice, a partner in crime! By having consensual unnatural sex with Anwar. An accomplice is liable to be punished under the same law in which his partner committed, though maybe with a lighter sentence.
"Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan is not being charged with sodomy because he is the complainant, Home Minister Datuk Seri Syed Hamid Albar said."
"When a person is the reporter of an alleged offence, if you charge the person, he will feel he is not protected," Syed Hamid said.
He stressed that Anwar is innocent until proven guilty. - Source NST
Let's just say, you and I committed a crime. You brought down a mocking bird with a slingshot. The bird was injured, unable to fly, then I jumped and strangled the mocking bird to its death. I am the killer of a mocking bird, and you are the accomplice by assisting in the murder.
Off you went to a nearby police station, lodged a report that I killed a mocking bird. During trial in a mocking bird court, I was charged of a heinous crime. And you were freed, because you are the complainant. Is it fair for me?
It's even more sinister, if indeed the mocking bird is still alive. No case.
Timeline of missing plane raises questions
10 years ago
2 comments:
Swearing on live tv doesn't prove anything either. Evidence is what matters here ... as in all cases.
Your blog keeps getting better and better! Your older articles are not as good as newer ones you have a lot more creativity and originality now keep it up!
Post a Comment