Search Link

Sunday, August 31, 2008

Media - Medium of Thoughts


"Topinai Ko Ngaavi... Kopisanangan om kosuabon..... Islam Hadhari, Islam Woyoon Tokou"

English: Dear Friends... Good Morning..... Islam Hadhari, is the Islam that we worship"

Bahasa: Saudara Sekalian... Selamat Pagi..... Islam Hadhari, Islam yang kita Ikuti"

I heard the line above while listening to a Sabah's Kadazan Dusun radio program. It was said by supposedly a muslim Dusun newsreader. He said that in a-matter-of-factly tone before continuing with the news of the day. I don't know about you, but this certainly raise my eyebrow. But the others who were with me listening to the radio didn't notice anything unusual, it's oblivious, until I pointed it out to them.

For the folks in remote villages, radio is their only source of information. For catching up on news, gossips, and entertainment. Save for a handful of educated and informed bunch, there should be significant portion of the Kampung folks who will believe entirely on what's aired on radio. Even for those who have a heart of stone, what is being fed unto you daily through media may somehow seeps into your brain, subconsciously.

Do you know why great athletes always seen speaking to themselves before they start an event? It's a motivational way to tell themselves that it can be done, no obstacles are too great, and if practiced often enough, it could lead to them winning. This self motivation is crucial to divide the boys from the men. It can either injected into you by yourself, or it can be slowly given to you by others, from what you see, touch, smell, sense and of course on what you "listen".

Our being is divided into two parts, the conscious and the subconscious. Just like a floating iceberg, only 10% of our being is conscious. While the remaining 90% is governed by the subconscious. Just like when you are driving a car, if you are a seasoned driver that is; you would do gear shifting subconsciously, sometimes you don't even think much about it, when negotiating a corner or climbing a steep slope, all are done systematically without you even need to think about it consciously.

But do you remember how was it when you first drive a car? It's very difficult to divide our attention, between the brakes, the clutch, gear, accelerator, rear view mirror, side mirror, etc. Do you remember how you wish you have brought along the big wardrobe mirror in your bedroom to be put into the car? I did, because all the mirrors seem inadequate when I first tried a reverse parking.

Whatever stuffs that we listen, will be subconsciously processed into our brain, and if you are not strong enough in consciously filtering what goes in to your subconscious realm, then you are in for a ride. Because what you listen will become your thoughts. The thoughts in turn will become you actions. Actions become habits. Habits become Characters. And Characters become your Destiny. Got it?

Back to the radio program. It started with couple of announcements regarding the fasting month for the muslim. Its meaning to the worshipers, what rituals to perform during fasting, what to avoid, and what to do. Followed by announcements about the time for breaking of fast, for each and every constituency in Sabah. Ok, they are fine, it's good to keep the people informed, so that the worshipers can plan ahead their daily activities. And the non-muslim also have a chance to organize functions attended by the muslim, perhaps after the breaking of fast.

Some may argue that Islam is the official religion, therefore RTM (Radio Televisyen Malaysia) have automatic right to air whatever they want. Yes Islam is the official religion of Malaysia and I have no problem with that. But may I suggest that some part of christian prayer and Taoist, Buddhist, Hindu, the Bobolian Magavau, etc. Also to be aired at the same time. What if at the end of the prayer, the reader said something like this "Topinai Ko Ngaavi... Kopisanangan om kosuabon..... Kristian Katolik, Kristian Woyoon Tokou" or this "Nung Haro Nga Kesalahan Dau, Moi do Tanud id Bobolian Mongidu do Dusa Kio, Blessed be Kinoringan". What would happen?

My suggestion above may not be relevant in the peninsula, but in Sabah it is truly acceptable. Think about it, majority of the Kadazan Dusuns are christian, yes maybe some are still sticking to animism. Pardon me but is it right to call the animists as pagan? The voice of the majority shall be heard over the media. Not the minority amongst the majority. Though I still have no problem with it, because Islam the official religion in Malaysia, provided the radio also airs program about other religions. Then it is fair, Isn't it?

If you ask the minority to respect the sensitivity of the official religion, the minority in return shall get the same respect.

What do you think?

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

Syabas Patrick Sindu, Syabas Eric Majimbun


The Consumer Association of Sabah and Labuan (Cash) called for review of the Malaysia Agreement by a Royal Commission of Inquiry as well as a referendum on the review. Its President, Datuk Patrick Sindu in a statement Monday called for the referendum provided the electoral rolls are cleansed of all "project IC" holders.

In another development, Eric Majimbun has called for a CONVENTION ON SABAH ISSUES to be held in Kota Kinabalu on August 30, from 12.30 pm to 4.30 pm. He said the current political development in the country had prompted SAPP to organize this convention.

The convention is a follow up to a Special Committee chaired by Majimbun which was set for the purpose of collecting, compiling and analyzing issues submitted by the people.

We feel it is important during this critical period for the people to re-connect with the history of Sabah's independence, the position of Sabah as a state within the Federation of Malaysia as well as the current economic condition of the State

I see this as a first step in restoring Sabah's sovereignity as a partner in the federation of Malaysia. We have long been regarded simply as one of the fourteen stripes in Jalur Gemilang, the Malaysian flag. To put it straight! We are not one of fourteen, We are one of three partners in Malaysia.

Patrcik Sindu and Eric Majimbun can be sure of support from all Sabahans. We are behind any move, big or small, in restoring the original twenty points agreement during the formation of Malaysia. We love Malaysia, it's just the way we were unfairly treated, by the running government which made it severely unfair for Sabah.

It's a little disappointing that only now these leaders have got the audacity to speak. In the midst of change, perhaps after Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim won the election in Permatang Pauh last night. Nonetheless, I still support them.

Syabas Patrick, Eric. Syabas Inspektor Sahap, Vah Raja Vah... You are our Sivaji the Boss.

Sunday, August 24, 2008

Are we Independent?

Past pre-independence heroes sure had taught us many things, they were the ones who fought for our country's independence. Yes, we can learn a lot from our history. The Malaysian heroes, how they started a revolution, how they carried on and eventually emerged as victors. Later immortalized in our Malaysian school history books. Though questionably most of the stories that are told in our textbooks were, may I say Malayan heroes rather than Malaysians.

For one we are taught that the price of independence was not cheap. It takes sheer grit, tenacity and lots of guts to achieve independence. To be free from those who robbed us of our land, of our freedom. To rule the land ourselves, not to be dependent to others, and to protect our women and children from intruders who are 'not like us'.

In pre-independence Malaya it was to get out from the colonial British rule. Because the British, they are 'not like us', they are white we are brown. They are christians while we are muslim, buddhist, hindus, pagans, etc, though they were already colonies of Christians in certain places. They wear silly coat but we wear songkok and baju melayu and some other traditional attires. They use toilet paper but we use left hands and water to clean our ass after pooping, that is at least true to some of us.

Most of what we know about these past heroes came from the school history books. We have been taught of the likes of Tokku Paloh, Tok Janggut, Abdul Rahman Limbong, Tok Gajah, Mat Kilau and Dato Bahaman. These Malay heroes started revolutions against the British, fought for justice they say. Mentioned quite inconspicuously in the textbooks, but one worth mentioning is Mat Salleh. He was 'different' from the rest because he is "Sabahan".

That's right Mat Salleh is Sabahan, similarly fought against the British in Sabah. Please remember, he fought the British before Sabah merged into Malaysia. Mat Salleh, a prominent hero in history, known to have special power, and his body was said to be impenetrable by bullets. Mat Salleh is and epitome of a Great Sabahan, I think he deserves greater respects than just a couple of references in the textbooks, and a sorry looking memorial in interior Tambunan.

Yesterday, I saw a movie about Mat Kilau on TV. In one part he said his fight against the British was to force the British to leave Malaya, as they 'are different'. Mat Kilau also quoted in the movie that the British are stealing from the Malayans, and robbing the Malay to enrich themselves. The fight against the British was to uphold local religion, race and the country. Since the fight was in pre-independence Malaya, therefore I think Mat Kilau's fight was for Islam, Malay and Malaya.

Malaya was blessed with natural resources such as gold, tin("Bijih Timah"), rubbers, etc. The British were taking all these wealth back to their own country while the Malays were continuously denied of their rights. Kringgg!!!! Now Do you hear a bell ringing? Is this happening in our own backyard? Do you know that Sabah and Sarawak are main contributors to oil production in Malaysia? Mind you, Sabah is also a major producer of Malaysia palm oil exports. And do you know where do the money goes?

So cruel was the British to the Malays. They came, they saw, they conquered and they continue to squezee every drop of wealth out of Malaya. And that reason had ultimately motivated the fighters to revolt and subvert against the colonialist. And I don't know whether it's a sheer coincidence, or perhaps just a plain joke; that in colloquial Malay, the "Whites" are called "Mat Salleh" regardless of whether thay are British or not.

Now this raised another question! Since the Malay historically hated the British, or the Whites, or in other word the "Mat Salleh". Is there any implicit meaning in that namesake? Does "Mat Salleh" translates to Sabahan too?

Phew!!! I divert, now back to the original topic. Are we Independent? And why we want it so much? It is like a coveted prize sought after by any community in the world. More so for a community which is ruled by others who are 'not like them'.

If it happens that a community is led by someone who 'is different' racially, culturally and religiously. That will make every member of that community to start to question the leader's eligibility to lead them. Why was he elected? Would he converts us all into his belief? Will our culture and religion diminish through his differing opinions? Will he dilutes our culture and institutionalize his culture upon us?

Worries of being racially, religiously and culturally persecuted do have credential. Because there is no guarantee that the elected 'different' leader will not flex his power to convert the nation out of his own free whims.

Being in a position of power will make it easy for him to proselytize his belief, which 'is different' from the belief of the people under his reign. And it has historic credibility too, since we know that Christianity flourished in Europe, started because one of the Emperors embraced christianity.

I don't quite remember the Emperor's name and country though. Was it Constantine Emperor of Rome? Do you remember? Nevertheless, what evident was that since then, the proliferation of christianity got into higher gear and the rest is history. I am sure other religions also share similar story with the Christians.

It's commonplace that whenever there's a group of people embracing a common understanding, culture, race and religion. Then there'll be a conscience in each and everyone member in the community, the urge to ordain a leader elected from amongst them. One who aspires to champion their race, culture and religion.

One that will not deny whatever their clerics or religious gurus say. One 'among them', 'think like them', 'speak like them', 'laugh like them', aspire to multiply their numbers 'exponentially' in a 'shortest time possible', even if it means converting the others who are 'not like them'. And of course pray to the 'same god like them'.

The above characteristics alone will still not be enough, it is not easy to be a leader to them, the leader must also not have any alliances with those who 'are different' from them. Because it is possible that the leader might be an agent planted by the others to weaken them, he might 'sold them out' to the others who are 'not like them'.

For the people in the community, the abhorrence and the urge to topple and replace that 'different' leader will be paramount, notwithstanding that the leader is actually one of them. They will seek and consult any religious figure among them, flip through religious verses, burning hundreds of jars of oil for light to study archaic scripts, with one objective, which is to find fault in the 'different' leader.

By all means to bring the leader down, with religious and cultural hatred, sometimes it will cross along racial lines as well. The scholars in the community will start to incite racial and religious hatred, they will pour gasoline into a subtle fire until the leader is expelled out by his own people. Racial harmony will be the last thing they want, as long as the possible 'different' leader does not succeed in his quest to be a leader.

In Malaysia though, we do and we still have a choice. To continue on with this historically mired racist sentiment and narrow-mindedness or to prove the history wrong and we can chart our own destiny to a better Malaysia. To the question of Are we Independent? The answer is No! we are not independent yet if racism and religious persecution are what we see happening right before our eyes.

Thursday, August 21, 2008

Signs of Desperation

Yesterday August 21st, at about 8:15am, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi took an LRT ride from Serdang Station to Masjid Jamek Station. The report in major newspapers stated that he was alone in the act. And yes no officially dressed escorts, no silly coat-draped officials under scorching Malaysian sun.



If you look closely though, there could be his bodyguards in the background. After all, sure he needs protection from possible danger. And I wonder how many reporters he brought along. Come on lah! Of course he wants to make sure this simple act published all over the media, particularly around Permatang Pauh.

Take note that in The Star paper, the heading of the report is "PM quietly takes public transport to experience commuters’ problems". Now, Im asking you. Do you think he was spontaneous in this act? Do you think he woke up in the morning, suddenly feeling itchy in the *tut* to ride the LRT? And By series of miraculous coincidences, that all the reporters also rode on the same tube, giving them golden opportunity to snap pictures? No it's silly! Someone had directly or indirectly could have invited reporters to snap pictures while he was 'seen' jostling in the sardin-packed LRT tube.

Poor commuters, they must have loathed the presence of the Prime Minister, his bodyguards and reporters in the LRT. Moreover the reporters must have brought along many equipments, lighting and bulky SLR camera, with elongated lenses. The lenses could have accidentally poked some unsuspecting commuters in the train, while reporters were getting the best position to take best pictures of the prime minister, in what looks like a frown isn't it?

Malaysia mainstream media, as you knew it, after this will start to pour out overused banal cliches such as "Berjiwa Rakyat", "Turun Padang", "Berhati Rakyat", "Berkenan Melihat Masalah Rakyat", "Memahami Masalah Rakyat", "Prihatin", etc. Seriously all these overused cliches make me wanna poop! They are commonly used in Malaysia, during ordination of a leader or any dignitary of state.

If Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi is seriously Berjiwa Rakyat, then why only now he do this? When we know that next tuesday is the election day for Permatang Pauh, when we know that the result of the election will be a turning point, that will lead to either glory or debacle for Barisan Nasional.

Nowadays Barisan Nasional have shown Many sign of desperations, SOS. Almost immediately after the March 8 general election. Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi went to Sabah, supposedly to respond to calls for greater recognition for Sabahans MP in national politic. He brought along goodie bags full of candies for Sabahans. Do you still remember what he announced during the visit?

RM 1 billion special allocation for Sabah, monetary allocation for assemblyman and MPs, Borneonisation of Sabah civil service, Forming of Cabinet Committee On Illegal Immigrants, the scrap of the Sabah Federal Development Department, appointment of Sabah-born Professor Datuk Kamaruzaman Ampong as the new vice-chancellor of Universiti Malaysia Sabah, and 300MW (Megawatt) power station would be built in Kimanis, Papar.

Also a panel, jointly chaired by the state secretary and Sabah Federal Secretary, had been set up to streamline functions said to be overlapping with the federal and state agencies. And “Focus Group” on poverty established by the government in efforts to wipe out abject poverty and reduce poverty rate would focus on poverty eradication in Sabah and Sarawak.

Can anyone tell me how many promises were made? I am lazy to count lah. How many have been implemented? By "implemented" I mean completely done, proper execution and follow-up, not only by one, two or three cases. Like in the Borneonisation topic. What about the RM 1 billion? Where did they spent the money on? Any improvement on the rakyat? On what stuffs did the assemblymen and MPs used the monetary allocation on? Can anyone tell us? Can anyone give a statistic on the spending?

Does anyone remember how many panels, special group, task force, board, committees, commission, working group, focus group, etc.. have been promised by Barisan Nasional? Not from 1957, because that would be uncountable weren't they? But beginning from March 8, 2008 until today. How many? Can you count?

To Datuk Seri, we dare you to take a ride from Kuala Penyu to Sandakan to Kinabatangan in Sabah. Take the mini bus please, use small sampan to reach remote area along the Kinabatangan river. And please no reporters and no bodyguards, see if you can survive.

Sunday, August 17, 2008

Balik Susah, Lari pun Susah

Malaysian Bar Council drama continued on until this week, and I believe for more weeks to come. Mind you, the issue will stick on for generations to come. Because Malaysian ministers had called upon a stop to any open forum that touches on religion. Prime Minister himself had urged everyone to stop from discussing the issue.

In other word, the conversion "to" Islam issue will always be kept bottled, swept under the carpet to maintain racial and religious harmony in Malaysia. But I personally think it is a grave mistake to stop the discussions, because religion and racial issues can only be resolved through open discourse and public understanding. God willing, through open forum, we will thrive and cherish our diversity instead of eternally mired in religous disputes.

If it is to be kept bottled, I think that there will be a time when all the issues will explode into crisis proportions. When the downtrodden and the oppressed had had enough, when any attempt to subdue the shits from coming out from the shithole will fail. And we will be doomed, drowned in the sea of shits that we've been covering for a long long time.

As what Datuk Zahid Hamidi puts it, discussions can be done behind closed door. The complainants, the government and the courts will have to settle any conversion issues amicably hidden from the media, solid curtain to block the discussions from the ever anxious public. I wonder what kind of clandestine settlements would satisfy all the parties involved?

I think the so-called "settlement" behind closed-door is to keep the angry public from knowing, and to maybe, remember "just maybe" to bend a few religious rules, to cut corner here and there to suit our multicultural and multi-ethnic backgrounds and sensitivities, or perhaps compensations also on the card.

At this juncture, I am wondering whether this or that religion actually allows such covert discussions and of course also the bending of rules to be done. Do they?

Because if the religion do permit bending of rules, then it wouldn't be that divine anymore isn't it? What written in the books are sacred and believed to be uttered directly from God. Be it the holy book of the christians, hindus, muslims, etc. God didn't say that you can make exception here and there, that this case is special because the accused or accuser is a king.

No, it's not like that. If you believe in God, what is written must be fully followed, and blindly at times. Whatever the closed door settlements may be, even if it is meant to assuage the families involved, and also to keep the radical public from knowing. It is probably religiously or conscientiously wrong. Most probably a gravely wrong sin as well.

As Sabahan, I think majority of the Non-Muslims in Sabah backed the open forum as a viable route to settle conversion issues once and for all. Because in Sabah, the religious composition is much more baffling, sometimes you will find members of a family professing different religions.

Go and ask any of your Sabahan friends, they will tell you "O ya my aunt is a muslim, her son is a catholic though, and her ex-husband now is a protestant". For example my friend who is from Ranau, he is professing SIB Christian, his mom is a muslim, because she was married to an imam. She separated from the imam and married a catholic, and now she considered herself a non-muslim. She has five children in her first marriage with the imam, and the eldest is now a SIB church leader in one of the village.

Confusing isn't it? Well, it's not uncommon in Sabah, thanks to the previous leaders mass conversion policies in the 80's. They successfully make Sabah as one hell of a religions melting pot. And yes, conversion issues are prominent in Sabah.

There's no denying that cases such as Subashini's are happening in Sabah, and Sabahans must have felt equally threatened too when the Bar Council forum was abruptly ended, when some so-called defender of a religion barged in.

There were calls for certain 'Pig to Return to China' or 'Babi Balik Cina'. Now it doesn't take a rocket scientist to think that what they meant was to urge the forum organizers, and panelists to go back to their own country for good. And Not to stir the religious sentiment of the majority.

For Sabahans who support such an open forum, me included, it's a bit bewildering. Because that calls to Return to China should take effect on us as well. The thing is we came from Sabah, therefore we cannot Balik Cina. We have nothing there. We can go back to where we originated from, to Sabah. But we are already in Sabah, then where to "Balik"?

If we could not balik, then we should "Jalan", but where to "Jalan"? We cannot run away from Sabah either. Actually the actions of about 300 demonstrators during the forum had successfuly put us in a quandary. Perhaps we should "Lari" or "Keluar".

What we want is to find solution acceptable to everybody, and please not to suppress. PAS calls that Muzakarah or Muqabalah, to talk, not to flex muscle. Tell me, Is barging into one's forum is in the spirit of muqabalah or muzakarah?

Thursday, August 7, 2008

To Kill a Mocking Bird - Saiful's Cornered

Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim was charged yesterday in a session court. Apparently as a replacement for the AG. The Solicitor General Datuk Idris Harun found enough evidence to charge Anwar.

Datuk Idris Harun is replacing his Boss, the Attorney General Datuk Gani Patail. Because Gani Patail himself is implicated with another case involving Anwar. Which is the fabrication of evidence in the 1998 sodomy trial. Anwar filed the charge against him and the IGP Musa Hassan. Do you think the Solicitor General truly act on his own Accord while his boss, the AG is around?

"Anwar was charged under Section 377B of the Penal Code, which his lawyers said referred to consensual sodomy". Now if it is true that Anwar is brought to court for having anal sex consensually with Saiful, then why Saiful is not similarly charge by committing the same crime?

It's common sense, Saiful is evidently an accomplice, a partner in crime! By having consensual unnatural sex with Anwar. An accomplice is liable to be punished under the same law in which his partner committed, though maybe with a lighter sentence.

"Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan is not being charged with sodomy because he is the complainant, Home Minister Datuk Seri Syed Hamid Albar said."

"When a person is the reporter of an alleged offence, if you charge the person, he will feel he is not protected," Syed Hamid said.

He stressed that Anwar is innocent until proven guilty.
- Source NST

Let's just say, you and I committed a crime. You brought down a mocking bird with a slingshot. The bird was injured, unable to fly, then I jumped and strangled the mocking bird to its death. I am the killer of a mocking bird, and you are the accomplice by assisting in the murder.

Off you went to a nearby police station, lodged a report that I killed a mocking bird. During trial in a mocking bird court, I was charged of a heinous crime. And you were freed, because you are the complainant. Is it fair for me?

It's even more sinister, if indeed the mocking bird is still alive. No case.

Wednesday, August 6, 2008

The Verdict - I Hit Jackpot

Last night I waited for the SAPP news. To my Dismay, Nothing, Nada, no news about SAPP in TV3. This morning I scour the net and finally found the verdict.

The result! Well my prediction result number 3 came true, wooohoooo.... What did I tell you? I wrote in my posting yesterday that Abdullah will need time to read SAPP reply to show cause letter, and another more time to understand the plain vanilla english or malay.

Perhaps, BN council can get help from primary six student, explain to him what Datuk Yong Teck Lee meant. No need to read between the lines and try to be ostensibly academic to the rakyat. Rakyat want decision, same goes to reduction of fuel price... AS always the BN government will need to study first, wait for full report. F**K!

This is the reaction from SAPP.

Responding to the PM announcement after the BN Supreme Council meeting today in Kuala Lumpur that BN needs to study in detail the answer given by SAPP before making any decision:

1. The SAPP 3-paragraph reply to the BN show cause letter was so simple and clear because it was a mere reiteration of SAPP¡¯s loss of confidence on the PM announced on June 18 and endorsed by the Supreme Council on June 20. What is so complicated that the BN needs to study in detail? Surely, the PM was stingy with the truth by saying that they (BN) needs to study the SAPP letter in detail.

2. In fact, we are totally disappointed that the BN leadership has again put off a key decision affecting Sabah just in order for them to finish a by-election campaign (Permatang Pauh) first. It shows that the BN has put their political interests above that of the people in Sabah.

3. We will forge ahead with greater force and unity in pursuit of our struggle for the people based on the our Declaration of eight points, to fight against the ¡°taxflation¡± and rapid rise in costs of living which has caused hardship to the people.

Issued by SAPP HQ

Tuesday, August 5, 2008

SAPP fate today

Barisan Nasional Supreme Council is to decide on the fate of SAPP in the coalition today. The BN lowly council is having a meeting, and come out with a decision.

I think the decision could be one of these;

1. SAPP expelled - This will not happen. BN Council with their littlest brain will not do this. But then if it happen, All glory be to SAPP.

2. Another Show Cause Letter - On why SAPP did not retract their stands. And there'll be a third show cause letter, if SAPP still persist. And the the fourth, fifth, sixth... BN Council will keep deferring decision until Datuk Yong Teck Lee tummy is full with money.

3. BN Council will have to study first and then make decision. As usual, Datuk Seri Abdullah Ahmad Badawi will tell the media that he has not seen the reply letter from SAPP. And that he will need time to read the letter, another more time to understand the message. It can easily dragged to 2 -3 months until he has ample time to bribe the rakyat with his goodies in the budget tabling, scheduled to be at the end of august.

Let's just wait and see.

TV3 - Buletin Utama Early Edition

Have you seen the TV series Early Edition? It's about a guy with a special ability to read about tomorrow's news. The papers were delivered to his doorstep by some mysterious figure.

He will be able to know early of what's going to happen tomorrow. Then he would set out on a rescue mission to save anyone who are predicted to die tomorrow, today.

What would you do? To be honest I would first read from the backpages and look for the winning numbers.

Anyway, I digress.. Today though I want to try my luck on prediction. This morning I read a news piece about how a lady reporter being assaulted by PKR Security personnel, in one of PKR political Ceramahs in Seberang Jaya Penang.

It was really unfortunate, a hapless female reporter was assaulted by PKR supporters. Nobody should assault another human being, more so if it's a she, by a group of men.

TV3, Being the Main Stream Bloody Media and all that. I want to predict that this shocking news will be the main topic in TV3 Buletin Utama tonight. I bet it will take at least ten minutes of the time.



Headline - PKR Samseng Assaulted a Female Reporter.

There will be comments from PM, DPM, or other ministers. To show to Malaysians, how bad the PR people are, and that there is no reason to vote for PR. That PR is just a bunch of Samseng Jalanan, Street Thugs.

As far as I can remember, there had been three cases that gave bad reputation to PR. One when Kelana Jaya MP Loh Gwo Burne was fisted by fellow PKR boy. Two when one rock star, read bandit, ehem... loosened his trouser and showed his bum to the crowd during PROTES rally in Stadium MPPJ, Kelana Jaya.

And this case here is number three. I wonder whether these moles were planted by someone with purpose.

Let's see whether my prediction materialized tonight.